This paper argues for the moral wrongness of wearing sexually provocative attire in public spaces, based on the theoretical framework of Jeremy Bentham's hedonistic utilitarianism. Bentham, one of the most prominent classical utilitarians, posits that an action is morally right if its consequences maximize pleasure and minimize pain. Employing the seven criteria Bentham proposes for measuring pleasure and pain—intensity, duration, certainty, propinquity, fecundity, purity, and extent—this article evaluates the pleasures and pains generated by sexually provocative attire in public spaces. It should be noted that the paper does not aim to defend Bentham's theory itself; rather, it claims that, within this theoretical framework, wearing such attire in public is morally wrong. In assessing the attendant pleasures and pains, the argument draws upon consequences supported by international scientific research. The findings indicate that the overall quantum of pain resulting from sexually provocative attire in public spaces significantly outweighs the pleasure it produces. Consequently, according to Bentham's hedonistic utilitarianism, wearing sexually provocative attire in public spaces is morally wrong.