Revelatory Ethics

Revelatory Ethics

Exploring technological approaches and methods of digital parenting

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. student of moral philosophy of Qom University
2 PhD in Muslim Social Sciences, Baqirul Uloom University
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Ethics, University of Qom, Qom, Iran
10.22034/re.2026.582230.2172
Abstract
The institution of the family in the digital age faces unprecedented challenges in raising a new generation. This study analyzes the fundamental conflict between the moral imperative to protect children from online dangers (such as inappropriate content, cyberbullying, and cybercrime) and the negative educational consequences of using technological control tools (such as privacy violations and weakening of independence). The main question of the research is how technological solutions can serve effective and ethical parenting. Using a descriptive-analytical method and relying on qualitative content analysis of library resources, this study explains the principles, advantages, disadvantages, and challenges of these tools within the framework of a "care" rather than a "police" approach. The findings suggest that successful use of these tools depends on adherence to the following ethical principles: (1) informing the child about how and why monitoring is being conducted, (2) matching the level of monitoring to the child’s maturity and developmental capabilities, and (3) transparency and disclosure of the monitoring process. This study provides a comprehensive and practical classification of technological solutions in four layers of defense (device, network, operating system, and application). Finally, it is concluded that the effectiveness of these tools depends more on the prevailing parenting style than on the nature of the technology. In the desired model of “authoritative parenting,” these tools are used not as an end in themselves, but as a means to facilitate dialogue, empower, and guide the child toward self-control and responsible digital citizenship.
Keywords
Subjects

تیلر، ریچارد.، و سانستاین، کاس. (۱۳۹۷). سقلمه: بهبود تصمیمات درباره تندرستی، ثروت و خوشبختی (مهری مدآبادی، مترجم). نشر هورمزد.
رضائی، حسین. (۱۴۰۲). چالش‌های اخلاقی الگوی کنترل‌گری والدین در زیست مجازی فرزندان و راهکارهای حل آن [پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه باقرالعلوم].
رضائی، حسین و فدایی،‌ مهدی (۱۴۰۲). تحلیل و ارزیابی دوراهی اخلاقی برادران دروغین در والدگری عصر دیجیتال. مطالعات اخلاق کاربردی سال ۱۳ پاییز ۱۴۰۲ شماره ۴ (پیاپی ۷۳). صص 65 84.
https://www.doi.org/10.22081/jare.2024.67750.1866
رضائی، حسین و حسینی سورکی،‌ سید محمد. (۱۴۰۳). چالش های اخلاقی والدگری در عصر دیجیتال. اخلاق وحیانی سال ۱۴ پاییز ۱۴۰۳ شماره ۳ (پیاپی ۳۲). صص 97 132.
https://www.doi.org/10.22034/ethics.2024.478425.2011
علاقبندراد، جواد؛ کارآموز، آناهیتا؛ شریفی، ونداد؛ و راعی، فرزانه. (۱۴۰۴). طراحی و تدوین بسته ویژه فرزندپروری برای استفاده از فناوری دیجیتال در کودکان و نوجوانان ایرانی. مجله روانپزشکی ایران، شماره 20 (4). صص 441-451.
فاطمه فولادی و زهرا جانقربانیان (۱۴۰۲). والدین دیجیتالی: تربیت و حمایت از کودکان در دنیای رسانه. مقاله کنفرانسی، اولین همایش ملی خانواده ایده‌آل. (قابل دسترسی در سیویلیکا)
نصیری، بهاره و بختیاری، آمنه. (۱۴۰۳). مطالعه کیفی تجارب زیسته مادران از تأثیر دایه‌گری دیجیتال بر خانواده. فصلنامه علمی مطالعات راهبردی ارتباطات، سال چهارم، شماره پیاپی 14، زمستان 140۳. صص ۹۴-۱۰۹.
https://www.doi.org/10.22034/rcc.2024.2039838.1161.
Álvarez-García, D., Núñez, J. C., González-Castro, P., Rodríguez, C., & Cerezo, R. (2019). The effect of parental control on cyber-victimization in adolescence: The mediating role of impulsivity and high-risk behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1159. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01159
Aziz, M., Aseptianova, L., Herman, S., & Susi, D. (2022). Digital parenting of children and adolescents in digital era. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 6(3), 450–457. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppp.v6i3.53589
Bate, F., MacNish, J., & Males, S. (2012). Managing student distraction: Responding to problems of gaming and pornography in a Western Australian school for boys. The University of Notre Dame Australia School of Education.
Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431691111004
Benrazavi, R., Teimouri, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Utility of parental mediation model on youth’s problematic online gaming. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 13(6), 712–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-015-9561-2
Bottino, S. M. B., Bottino, C. M. C., Regina, C. G., Correia, A. V. L., & Ribeiro, W. S. (2015). Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health: A systematic review. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 31(3), 463-475. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00036114
Chandrima, R. M., Kircaburun, K., Kabir, H., Riaz, B. K., Kuss, D. J., Griffiths, M. D., & Mamun, M. A. (2020). Adolescent problematic internet use and parental mediation: A Bangladeshi structured interview study. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 12, 100288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2020.100288
Ghosh, A. K., Hughes, C. E., & Wisniewski, P. J. (2020). Circle of trust: A new approach to mobile online safety for families. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376747
Hoffman, K. S. (2024, July 17). Social media addiction statistics. AddictionHelp.com. https://www.addictionhelp.com/social-media-addiction/statistics
Hovell, N. (2016). Relational Autonomy and the Ethics of Digital Monitoring. Ethics and Information Technology, 18(3), 191-201.
Keles, B., McCrae, N., & Grealish, A. (2020). A systematic review: The impact of social media on mental health in young people. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105707
Kizza, P. J. (2024). Unmasking the cyberbully: Understanding the psychological and social dynamics behind online abuse. Kampala International University.
Koong, H. F. (2013). Filial parenting is not working. In T. K. A. L. & D. M. H. Ho (Eds.), Filial piety: Psychological theories, research, and application (p. 343-351). Springer.
Küçükoba, E. (2023). Digital parenting and digital childhood: Raising gifted children born into the digital age. Journal of Interdisciplinary Education: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 1–10.
Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2012). EU Kids Online: Final report. London School of Economics and Political Science.
Mackenzie, C., & Stoljar, N. (Eds.). (2000). Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Oxford University Press.
Mackenzie, C. (2008). Relational Autonomy, Normative Authority and Perfectionism. Journal of Social Philosophy, 39(4), 512-533.
Matusko, M. (2017). Parental styles and upbringing of preschool children [Unpublished undergraduate thesis]. Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek.
OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 results (Volume III): Students’ well-being. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273856-en
Oshana, M. (2015). Is Relational Autonomy the Answer? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 32(3), 295-310.
Öztürk, G., & Şahin, F. (2023). Parents’ awareness of the conscious use of applications on smart devices: A scale development study. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11158-9
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Przybylski, A. K., & Nash, V. (2018). Internet filtering and adolescent exposure to online sexual material. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(7), 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0466
Shapka, J. D., & Law, D. M. (2013). Does one size fit all? Ethnic differences in parenting behaviors and motivations for adolescent engagement in cyberbullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 723–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9928-2
Stoilova, M., Bulger, M., & Livingstone, S. (2024). Do parental control tools fulfil family expectations for child protection? A rapid evidence review of the contexts and outcomes of use. Journal of Children and Media, 18(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-2798/2023/2265512
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
Wisniewski, P., Jia, H., Xu, H., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). ‘Preventative’ vs. ‘reactive’: How parental mediation influences teens’ social media privacy behaviors. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675293
World Health Organization. (2016). Growing up unequal: Gender and socioeconomic differences in young people’s health and well-being. WHO Regional Office for Europe.