Moral weakness is one of the important issues of the psychology of ethics, which deals with why and how the gap between knowledge and moral action appears. In a comprehensive definition, this phenomenon can be considered as a conscious action against the belief, judgment and principles that a person has accepted morally. Moral weakness or the problem of the gap between moral belief and action and the solution to fill this gap is one of the fundamental concerns of all people who have a heart for a virtuous life. In the meantime, one of the sciences that has a suitable capacity to explain this phenomenon and to express a solution for the treatment or prevention of this phenomenon, and which has received less attention, is the science of psychology. For this reason, the upcoming research with analytical method and using library resources aims to explain the factors affecting the occurrence of this problem and also the solution to prevent this phenomenon by paying attention to the great capacity of this knowledge and focusing on its cognitive approach. The results of the research indicate that imitation, lack of strengthening the power and rational reasoning, as well as irrational justification can be considered as the phenomena of moral weakness, and this weakness can be avoided by avoiding the acceptance of imitation words and mainly through argumentative discussions between educators and also Ethical riddles were designed to strengthen this issue by the trainers, as well as taking role models from moral people.
افلاطون (1380). دوره آثار افلاطون. ترجمه محمدحسن لطفیرضا کاویانی. تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشارات خوارزمی.
ارسطو (1389). اخلاق نیکوماخوس. مترجم دکتر محمدحسن لطفی تبریزی. تهران: نشر نو.
باباله زاده، مهدی (1402). پیشگیری از ضعف اخلاقی با رویکرد اخلاق اسلامی و مبتنی بر فلسفه عمل (مراحل پیشاتصور، تصور و تصدیق). پژوهشنامه اخلاق. ش 62. ص 68 ـ 51.
جواهری، علی (1398). جرایم مبتنی بر ترک فعل در نظام کیفری ایران. مجله علمی فقه، حقوق و علوم جزاء. شماره 11. ص 23 ـ 31.
سیف، علیاکبر (13869). تغییر رفتار و رفتاردرمانی نظریهها و روشها. تهران: نشر دوران.
شافر، دیوید (1390). روانشناسی رشد. ترجمه امیر خطیبی. تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
لاپسلی، مارتا (1389). نظریههای مرحلهای اخلاق، رشد اخلاقی. مترجمان محمدرضا جهانگیرزاده قمی و دیگران. قم: پژوهشگاه علوم و فرهنگ اسلامی.
لطفآبادی، حسین (1384). نقدنظریههای رشد اخلاقی پیاژه و کولبرگ و باندورا و ارائه الگویی نو برای پژوهشی در رشد اخلاقی دانشآموزان. فصلنامه نوآوریهای آموزشی. شماره 11.
مک ناتن، دیوید (1383). نگاه اخلاقی. ترجمه حسن میانداری، تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاهها (سمت).
مله، آلفرد آر (1392). ضعف اراده از دانشنامه فلسفه اخلاق. ترجمه انشاالله رحمتی، تهران: سوفیا.
هرگنهان، السون (1388). مقدمهای بر نظریههای یادگیری، ترجمه علیاکبر سیف، تهران، نشر دوران.
Bandura, Albert (2011), Social Learning Theory (1976, Prentice-Hall). Libgen. Lc.
Bandura, Albert (2015). Moral Disengagement_ How Good People Can Do Harm and Feel Good About Themselves.Worth Publishers.
Evans (2001). Moral Weakness. Philosophy, Vol. 50, p. 295.
Piaget, Jean (2009). The Moral Judgment of the Child. The Free Press Glencoe.
Rosthal, Robert (1967). Moral Weakness Remorse, vol. 76, Mind, New Serie: Oxford University Press.
Snarey and Samuelson (2005). Cognitive develomental tradition, p. 60 -70.
Snarey, John and Peter Samuelson (2008). Moral Education in the Cognitive Developmental Tradition. Lawrence Kohlberg’s Revolutionary Ideas. New York and London: Routledge.
Stacey, S. Horn, Christopher Daddis and Melanie Killen (2008). PeerRelationships and Social Groups: Implications for Moral Education. Handbook of Educational Psychology, New York and London: Routledge Taylor and Francicis Group.
Thero, Daniel p. (2006). Understanding Moral Weakness. New York: Amsterdam.
Thomas, R. Murray (1997). Moral Develoment Teories-Secular and Religious. GreenWood Press.
Tobias, Hoffmann (2008). Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy Volume 49, Weakness of Will from Plato to the Present. New York: The Catholic University of America Press.
Babolah zade,M. and Azarbayejani,M. (2025). Prevention of moral weakness in cognitive psychology with emphasis on the theories of Piaget, Kalberg and Bandura. Revelatory Ethics, 14(4), 141-168. doi: 10.22034/ethics.2025.479066.2013
MLA
Babolah zade,M. , and Azarbayejani,M. . "Prevention of moral weakness in cognitive psychology with emphasis on the theories of Piaget, Kalberg and Bandura", Revelatory Ethics, 14, 4, 2025, 141-168. doi: 10.22034/ethics.2025.479066.2013
HARVARD
Babolah zade M., Azarbayejani M. (2025). 'Prevention of moral weakness in cognitive psychology with emphasis on the theories of Piaget, Kalberg and Bandura', Revelatory Ethics, 14(4), pp. 141-168. doi: 10.22034/ethics.2025.479066.2013
CHICAGO
M. Babolah zade and M. Azarbayejani, "Prevention of moral weakness in cognitive psychology with emphasis on the theories of Piaget, Kalberg and Bandura," Revelatory Ethics, 14 4 (2025): 141-168, doi: 10.22034/ethics.2025.479066.2013
VANCOUVER
Babolah zade M., Azarbayejani M. Prevention of moral weakness in cognitive psychology with emphasis on the theories of Piaget, Kalberg and Bandura. Revelatory Ethics, 2025; 14(4): 141-168. doi: 10.22034/ethics.2025.479066.2013